http://dicom.nema.org/resources/ontology/DCMUID
http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49.htm
urn:ietf:rfc:3986
This fragment is available on en/copyright.html
This publication includes IP covered under the following statements.
| Type | Reference | Content |
|---|---|---|
| web | example.org | subject : Jan Jansen |
| web | example.org | author : Dr. Maria Schmidt |
| web | example.org | custodian : Amsterdam University Medical Center |
| web | example.org | http://example.org/fhir/Bundle/eps-jan-jansen |
| web | example.org | http://example.org/fhir/Bundle/hdr-jan-jansen |
| web | example.org | author : Radiology Department, Amsterdam UMC |
| web | example.org | http://example.org/fhir/ImagingStudy/ct-chest-study |
| web | example.org | http://example.org/wado-rs/studies/1.2.840.113619.2.55.3.604688119.969.1234567890.123/series/1.2.840.113619.2.55.3.604688119.969.1234567890.124/instances/1.2.840.113619.2.55.3.604688119.969.1234567890.125 |
| web | example.org | http://example.org/fhir/Bundle/imaging-report-jan-jansen |
| web | example.org | http://example.org/fhir/Bundle/lab-report-jan-jansen |
| web | hl7.eu |
|
| web | ihe-europe.net |
|
| web | euridice.org |
|
| web | hl7.eu |
IG © 2025+ HL7 Europe
.
Package hl7.fhir.eu.health-data-api#1.0.0-ballot based on FHIR 4.0.1
.
Generated
2026-03-13
|
| web | profiles.ihe.net | IUA Authorization Server |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | IUA Resource Server |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | IUA Authorization Client |
| web | eur-lex.europa.eu | The EHDS Regulation initially defines six priority categories of electronic health data that all Member States must support first for cross-border primary use. These categories are explicitly listed in Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2025/327. |
| web | eur-lex.europa.eu | Article 105 specifies the date when support for these priority categories is required: 26 March 2029 for categories (a), (b) and (c); 28 March 2031 for (d), (e) and (f). |
| web | eur-lex.europa.eu | The definitions of the priority categories comes from ANNEX I of the EHDS Regulation. |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | IHE IUA - Defines authorization and access control actors and mechanisms. We use the actors and transactions model. |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | IHE QEDm - Defines how a client can query for existing FHIR resources from a FHIR server. Referenced where compatible with IPA. |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | IHE Consistent Time - Defines the use of Network Time Protocol (NTP) to provide consistent time across systems. |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | IHE ATNA - Referenced for secure transport requirements (TLS 1.2 Floor using BCP195 Option). |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | IUA Resource Server - Required |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | IUA Authorization Server - Required if authorization is handled internally; not required if using external authorization infrastructure. See Authorization Server Deployment . |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | QEDm Clinical Data Source ( CapabilityStatement ) - where compatible with IPA |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | QEDm Clinical Data Source ( CapabilityStatement ) - where compatible with IPA |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | QEDm Clinical Data Consumer ( CapabilityStatement ) - where compatible with IPA |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | QEDm Clinical Data Consumer ( CapabilityStatement ) - where compatible with IPA |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | Authorization Server |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | Resource Server |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | Authorization Client |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | In deployments using an external Authorization Server, token validation commonly involves coordination with that Authorization Server; where supported and required by policy, Resource Servers MAY use token introspection via IHE IUA ITI-102 . |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | All API communications SHALL use secure transport as defined by IHE ATNA with the TLS 1.2 Floor using BCP195 Option. |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | This IG uses IHE IUA for actor definitions and groups those actors with SMART Backend Services behavior. IUA itself notes its relationship to SMART-on-FHIR : "IUA is not based on SMART-on-FHIR, but does strive to not conflict with that standard." |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | IHE IUA |
| web | profiles.ihe.net |
IHE Document Sharing
distinguishes type
(specific document types, typically LOINC codes) from category
(broad classification) on DocumentReference. This IG constrains type
for document discovery but leaves category
to content IGs
and implementations.
|
| web | eur-lex.europa.eu |
Article 14
of the EHDS regulation defines six priority categories of electronic health data. EEHRxFDocumentPriorityCategoryCS
provides informative codes for these categories, organizing them by the LOINC type
codes consumers use for document search.
|
| web | hl7.eu | Europe Laboratory Report |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | IHE Document Sharing |
| web | eur-lex.europa.eu | Source: EUR-Lex Regulation (EU) 2025/327 |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | IHE IUA - Defines authorization and access control actors and mechanisms. Aligned with SMART. We use the actors and transactions model from this specification. |
| web | hl7.eu | HL7 Europe Laboratory Report |
| web | hl7.eu | HL7 Europe Hospital Discharge Report |
| web | hl7.eu | HL7 Europe Imaging Study/Report / Imaging Manifest |
| web | github.com | Open issues under discussion in this IG. Each has a corresponding GitHub Issue where you can add input to existing issues, or create your own. |
| web | github.com | GitHub Issue |
| web | github.com | GitHub Issue |
| web | github.com | GitHub Issue |
| web | fhir.ehdsi.eu | In most European exchanges the consumer already holds a trusted patient identifier (national health ID, MRN, or similar). Identifier-based lookup produces an unambiguous match and avoids dependence on demographic data quality, which varies in completeness and localization across member states. The MyHealth@EU cross-border infrastructure already follows this pattern. |
| web | hl7.eu | This section defines the API requirements for EHR systems that provide EEHRxF data that conforms to the HL7 EU Hospital Discharge Report content profile. |
| web | hl7.eu | For detailed content profiles, see the EU Imaging Study Manifest IG . |
| web | hl7.eu |
The EURIDICE MADO profile
defines both a FHIR encoding and a DICOM KOS encoding for imaging manifests. When a system supports both representations, it publishes two DocumentReference resources
linked via relatesTo
:
|
| web | github.com | This pattern was chosen ( #50 ) because it works across all Document Sharing transports (MHD, XDS, XCA) without requiring content negotiation at the server. |
| web | euridice.org |
Feedback requested on the dual-DocumentReference pattern.
The MADO profile
dual-encodes imaging manifests in both FHIR and DICOM representations. This IG uses two DocumentReferences linked via relatesTo.transforms
so that consumers can select the encoding they support based on contentType
. This pattern was chosen for compatibility with document sharing infrastructures (MHD, XDS, XCA), where each document entry carries exactly one format.
|
| web | github.com | Implementers: does the dual-DocumentReference pattern work for your imaging infrastructure and content negotiation needs? Would a single-DocumentReference model be preferable? Feedback is welcome via Issue #50 . |
| web | hl7.eu | The content is defined by the HL7 EU Medication Prescription and Dispense profile. |
| web | hl7.eu | HL7 Europe Laboratory Report |
| web | www.ehtel.eu | This specification provides an overview of the data sets required by XtEHR WP5.1 . |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | IHE-QEDm |
| web | eur-lex.europa.eu | The regulatory basis is primarily found in EHDS ANNEX II - Essential Requirements for EHR Systems ( EUR-Lex , Local Copy ), which describes an obligation for EHR systems to include an Interoperability Component that does the following: |
| web | www.xt-ehr.eu | For more details on the Xt-EHR work, see the Xt-EHR Website . Note: Xt-EHR deliverables are not yet publicly released. |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | [Out of Scope] 6 Logging Component Requirements: This Implementation Guide does not specify the logging component format or the interoperability of logs from EHR systems. EHDS ANNEX II requires the generation of local audit logs for review, but does not specify the data format or require interoperability of those logs. Implementers needing standardized audit logging should consider IHE ATNA and IHE BALP (Basic Audit Log Patterns), which define FHIR AuditEvent-based audit log profiles. The IHE profiles used in this IG (MHD, PDQm, IUA) recommend but do not require ATNA grouping. |
| web | profiles.ihe.net |
IHE QEDm
- Query Existing Data mobile, where compatible with IPA. QEDm has a goal of aligning with IPA.
|
| web | profiles.ihe.net | PCC-44 - Mobile Query Existing Data transaction |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | The IHE mXDE profile provides more detail on how to extract resources from documents while maintaining provenance. |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | IHE QEDm |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | PCC-44 Mobile Query Existing Data |
| web | profiles.ihe.net | IHE mXDE |
| web | build-fhir.ehdsi.eu | MyHealth@EU NCPeH API |
5-1_exchange.png
|
ContentExchangeXtEhr.png
|
ExGroup_Doc.png
|
ExGroup_DocAssembly.png
|
ExGroup_Group.png
|
actors_overall.png
|
docExchange_1.png
|
docExchange_2.png
|
resExchange_1.png
|
resExchange_2.png
|
tree-filter.png
|
xtehr-logo.png
|